CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IS ONE OF THE FAMOUS METHODS ON STUDYING THE TEXTS, AND IS USED IN THE SPHERES OF COMMUNICATIONS, CULTURE AND SOCIETY. OF DIFFERENT METHODS, THE FAIRCLAUGH ANALYSIS METHOD WAS SEEN SUITABLE FOR DEALING WITH THE QUESTION OF THIS THESIS, SAADI'S APPROACH TOWARDS POWER STRUCTURE, SINCE BY USING THIS METHOD WE CAN UNDERSTAND THAT DISCOURSES USED IN THE TEXT DEAL WITH MAKING AND REMAKING UNEQUAL POWER RELATIONS AMONG SOCIAL GROUPS OR TRY TO MAKE CHANGES IN THE POWER STRUCTURE. THIS PATTERN WAS FOLLOWED IN THE FIRST CHAPTER OF GOLESTAN OF SAADI- MANNER OF KINGS- AND THE TEXT OF THE CHAPTER WAS STUDIED IN THREE LEVELS: 1- LANGUAGE DESCRIPTIONS 2- INTERTEXTUAL COMMENTARY 3- DISCOURSE EXPLANATION. BASED ON OUR STUDY, IT IS CONCLUDED THAT AT THE FIRST CHAPTER, SAADI SIMULTANEOUSLY PUSHES FORWARD TWO RELATIVELY CONTRADICTING VOICES, ONE OF THEM TRIES TO ESTABLISH THE POSITION OF KINGDOM AND THE OTHER TAKES A CRITICIZING LOOK ON IT. FINALLY, WE CONCLUDE THAT SAADIS UTOPIA IS ACHIEVED BY RESPECTING SUBJECTS AND DIGNIFYING KINGS.